Enterprise
Framework-aligned assessments for CISOs and GRC leaders. Defensible results, clear gap analysis, board-ready outputs.
Every quarter, you face the same problem: produce a maturity assessment that satisfies the board, survives audit scrutiny, and meets regulatory expectations. The options aren't great. Consultants charge $50,000+ for a single assessment—and every firm produces different results using different methodologies. Your internal spreadsheet has drifted so far from any recognised framework it won't survive external review. Generic checklists lack the rigour anyone takes seriously.
After a breach, the first question regulators ask is: what assessments did you have? Can you demonstrate a consistent, defensible approach to measuring your security posture? Or will you be explaining why your methodology changed every time a new consultant walked in the door?
APRA CPS 234 requires regulated entities to maintain information security capability commensurate with threats. The SOCI Act demands critical infrastructure operators demonstrate cyber security maturity. AESCSF reporting is now mandatory for energy sector participants. PCI DSS 4.0 raises the bar for anyone handling card data. These aren't suggestions—they're requirements with real consequences for non-compliance.
Directors face personal liability for cyber security failures. They're no longer satisfied with "we're working on it." They want to see maturity scores, trend lines, gap closure rates, and benchmark comparisons. They want assurance that's defensible—not a consultant's subjective opinion that changes with whoever's in the room.
A Big 4 maturity assessment costs $40,000-$80,000 and takes 4-8 weeks. The methodology varies by firm, by partner, sometimes by consultant. You can't compare this quarter's results to last quarter's because different people assessed you differently. And when the partner who "understood your business" leaves, you start from scratch.
CISOs last an average of 18-24 months. The ones who survive longer can demonstrate measurable progress, justify their budget, and show the board a clear picture of risk. The ones who can't point to defensible assessments and consistent improvement are the first to go when something goes wrong—or when the CFO asks what they're actually getting for the security spend.
Every gap identified, ranked by risk level, with specific remediation actions. Framework-aligned maturity assessments you run yourself, using the same methodology every time. Board-ready outputs in hours, not weeks. Results you can track quarter-over-quarter to demonstrate genuine progress. No consultant dependency. No methodology drift. Complete control over your assessment process.
Evaluate cybersecurity maturity against the Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework v2 with SP1/SP2/SP3 Security Profile targeting. 95–161 questions across 11 domains. 100% local — no data leaves your device.
Best suited for: Australian energy sector entities with AEMO reporting obligations
View AESCSF v2 Assessment →Assess maturity against the ACSC Essential Eight Maturity Model across all eight mitigation strategies and Maturity Levels 1–3. Covers application control, patching, macro security, admin privileges, MFA, and backups. 100% local — no data leaves your device.
Best suited for: Australian government agencies, contractors, and regulated organisations
View Essential Eight Assessment →Assess readiness for the EU Cyber Resilience Act (Regulation 2024/2847) with role-based assessments for Manufacturers, Importers, Distributors and Authorised Representatives. Up to 73 questions across 8 domains covering secure development, vulnerability management, and conformity.
Best suited for: Organisations placing products with digital elements on the EU market
View EU CRA Assessment →Assess organisational readiness for DORA (Regulation 2022/2554) with role-based assessments for Financial Entities and ICT Third-Party Service Providers. Covers all five DORA pillars including ICT risk management, incident reporting, resilience testing, and third-party risk.
Best suited for: Banks, insurers, investment firms, payment institutions, and ICT service providers to the financial sector
View DORA Assessment →Assess organisational compliance maturity against the General Data Protection Regulation. Covers data protection principles, individual rights, accountability requirements, and international transfers.
Best suited for: Organisations processing EU personal data or serving EU customers
View GDPR Assessment →Evaluate your Information Security Management System against the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard. Covers all ISMS clauses (4–10) and Annex A controls with structured maturity scoring.
Best suited for: Organisations preparing for or maintaining ISMS certification
View ISO 27001 Assessment →Evaluate your cybersecurity program against the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Comprehensive coverage of all six functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover.
Best suited for: Organisations seeking a globally recognised cybersecurity baseline
View NIST CSF Assessment →Prepare for SOC 2 examination with a structured evaluation against the Trust Services Criteria. Covers Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy.
Best suited for: SaaS providers and service organisations with enterprise customers
View SOC 2 Assessment →Evaluate third-party and supply chain cybersecurity risks. A comprehensive framework for assessing vendor security posture and managing supply chain risk across the full vendor lifecycle.
Best suited for: Organisations managing vendor and supply chain security risk
View Third-Party Risk Assessment →Assess your organisation's readiness against the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard. Comprehensive coverage of all PCI DSS requirements with SAQ-type filtering and maturity-based evaluation.
Best suited for: Organisations handling cardholder data or preparing for QSA audit
View PCI DSS Assessment →Contact us to discuss which assessment is right for your organisation.